NEW: 14-day FREE trial. Full platform access, no commitment. Start now
Squarerigger gives drivers, technicians, and supervisors a single way to flag an issue. A problem reported from
the cab becomes pending work in the shop without a phone call, a text thread, or a piece of paper.
A work request only helps when the problem gets captured clearly, routed
correctly, and turned into action before details get lost.
The driver texts the manager. Sometimes it gets read. By end of day, nothing's written down. The asset sits in the lot.
The driver submits a request from the cab, with the asset, location, and photos included. It lands in the shop queue.
Requests live in three places: a text thread, an inbox, and a list on a whiteboard. None of them is complete.
Pending requests sit in one queue, sortable by priority, asset, and submitter. New requests notify the assigned reviewer.
The decision is verbal or made in a phone call. The reasoning is not recorded. The same request can be approved twice by two people.
Approval, rejection, and reassignment write to the audit trail. Request reasoning and decisions are visible to submitters
The work order is built from scratch. Notes, photos, and the symptoms reported by the driver are re-keyed. Some context is lost.
The approved request is converted to a work order in a single step. Notes, photos, and asset attachment carry over without re-entry.
The driver asks the dispatcher. The dispatcher asks the shop.
The driver gives up reporting issues after a few cycles like this.
The driver sees the status of their request from the phone they used to submit it. Visible follow-through keeps drivers reporting.
The driver texts the manager. Sometimes it gets read. By end of day, nothing's written down. The asset sits in the lot.
The driver submits a request from the cab, with the asset, location, and photos included. It lands in the shop queue.
Requests live in three places: a text thread, an inbox, and a list on a whiteboard. None of them is complete.
Pending requests sit in one queue, sortable by priority, asset, and submitter. New requests notify the assigned reviewer.
The decision is verbal or made in a phone call. The reasoning is not recorded. The same request can be approved twice by two people.
Approval, rejection, and reassignment write to the audit trail. Request reasoning and decisions are visible to submitters
The work order is built from scratch. Notes, photos, and the symptoms reported by the driver are re-keyed. Some context is lost.
The approved request is converted to a work order in a single step. Notes, photos, and asset attachment carry over without re-entry.
The driver asks the dispatcher. The dispatcher asks the shop. The driver gives up reporting issues after a few cycles like this.
The driver sees the status of their request from the phone they used to submit it. Visible follow-through keeps drivers reporting.
The driver submits a
request from the cab
with a photo and priority
The request appears in
the repair shop's
pending queue
The maintenance
manager reviews and
approves it
The request becomes a
work order with notes
and photos carried over
The driver receives a
status update on their
phone
The intake matches who is reporting.
The decision lives with the request.
The driver who reported the issue sees what happened next.
The request is observable before it is approved.
The request and the work order share one record.
The intake matches who is reporting.
The request is observable before it is approved.
The decision lives with the request.
The request and the work order share one record.
The driver who reported the issue sees what happened next.
A request connects the inspection that found the problem to the
work order that closes it out.
Diagnostic codes from 70+
providers raise requests in
the same queue.
The pending queue is the same queue holding the rest of the work. Approved requests arrive with context intact.
Submission and status visibility on a single phone. Issues do not depend on someone remembering to walk to the office.
Triage, approval, and audit trail in one place. Repeat submissions and recurring issues become observable.
Driver-reported safety concerns are recorded with a time-stamp and follow-through visible to the safety team.
A work request is the report of an issue; a work order is the job that fixes it. Squarerigger lets supervisors approve, reject, or merge requests in one step.
Yes. The submission flow runs on phones and tablets. Asset, location, priority, photos, and notes can be attached from the same device.
Routing is configured during onboarding. A request can route by asset, by location, or by the role of the submitter. Notifications fire to the assigned reviewer when the request lands in the queue.
Yes. Rejected requests retain the audit trail, including the reasoning. The history is visible if the same issue is submitted again, which catches recurring patterns.
Repeat submissions surface in the queue and the request history. The shop can merge requests onto a single work order rather than create two jobs for the same problem.
Yes. Diagnostic trouble codes from the 70+ supported telematics providers raise requests in the same queue as driver and technician submissions.