NEW: 14-day FREE trial. Full platform access, no commitment. Start now
Technicians tap guided repair lists at the bay. Squarerigger auto-assigns the VMRS code, rolling
labor, parts, and vendor costs into clean fleet reports.
A VMRS code earns its keep downstream of the bay, in the work order it
attaches to and the reports that read it.
The repair goes in as free text, and every technician writes it up differently. A person can read it, a report cannot.
The technician codes the repair from a guided list, down to the failed part. No codebook, nothing to memorize.
Twenty write-ups for one alternator fault read twenty different ways, so no one groups them. The pattern never surfaces.
The same failure carries the same code on every asset in the fleet. The pattern shows up the first time anyone looks.
Someone reads invoices line by line and adds the numbers by hand. The total is only an estimate by the time it lands.
Labor, parts, and vendor cost roll up under the code automatically. Cost per repair type comes back as one clean number.
The claim gets missed because the failed part was never categorized. Rebuilding it by hand costs more than it returns.
The coded event ties the failure to the exact part and vendor on record. The claim is caught while the window is open.
Each location writes work up differently, so comparing two shops is mostly guesswork. PM intervals stay set by habit.
Coded records line up cleanly across every location and asset class. Repeat failures sharpen the PM schedule over time.
The repair goes in as free text, and every technician writes it up differently. A person can read it, a report cannot.
The technician codes the repair from a guided list, down to the failed part. No codebook, nothing to memorize.
Twenty write-ups for one alternator fault read twenty different ways, so no one groups them. The pattern never surfaces.
The same failure carries the same code on every asset in the fleet. The pattern shows up the first time anyone looks.
Someone reads invoices line by line and adds the numbers by hand. The total is only an estimate by the time it lands.
Labor, parts, and vendor cost roll up under the code automatically. Cost per repair type comes back as one clean number.
The claim gets missed because the failed part was never categorized. Rebuilding it by hand costs more than it returns.
The coded event ties the failure to the exact part and vendor on record. The claim is caught while the window is open.
Each location writes work up differently, so comparing two shops is mostly guesswork. PM intervals stay set by habit.
Coded records line up cleanly across every location and asset class. Repeat failures sharpen the PM schedule over time.
Pick the Failure, the
Code Follows.
A technician identifies
the repair from a list.
Squarerigger maps it to
its VMRS code.
Labor, parts, and vendor
cost attach to the code.
Coded records feed fleet
reports directly.
The value of a coded record shows up long after the repair is closed, in the reports, claims,
and comparisons that depend on every repair reading the same way.
A parts lead, a manager, and a controller each need a different number off the same bin.
Codes each repair from a guided list right at the bay, with no codebook and less re-keying.
Sees cost per repair type, repeat failures, and shop comparisons built on records that line up.
Reads parts usage against the coded repairs behind it, so stocking follows real fleet demand.
Gets comparable cost and warranty data across the assets the company owns. No manual tally.
No. Technicians identify the repair in plain language, and Squarerigger maps it to the correct VMRS code automatically. There is nothing to memorize.
Existing service history is part of the data migration step in onboarding. Prior records are brought over so coding and reporting do not restart at day one.
Yes. Coded data feeds the standard Squarerigger dashboards, and it also feeds out to an external BI tool through the integration layer.
The code is mapped the moment the technician identifies the repair, not as a second step afterward. The plain-language description doesn't change; a standard code just comes with it.
A coded failure ties the repair to the specific part and vendor, which is what makes a claim identifiable and defensible. Warranty-eligible repairs surface from the coded history instead of getting missed in free text.
Yes. Because every location codes work the same way, cost, downtime, and repair frequency compare directly across shops and asset classes without manual normalizing.